Updated Model and Treatment Suggestions

CFS Remission

Since I started this blog, some 530 posts ago, there have been significant changes in probiotics available and information available (for example uBiome results). My original model favored the reports from the University of Newcastle in Australia in 1998. The uBiome results from a sample of over a dozen readers of this blog confirmed parts of this report and also raise questions on other parts. In re-reading the report, there was only 4 controls to 27 patients — which may account for the differences they saw. I summarized below:

1998 Study uBiome Sample
Controls CFS Ratio  Ratio
Bifidobacterium 7% 2% 28% 21%
Bacteroides 93% 91% 98% 98%
Enterococcus 1% 24% 2400% 0%
Enterobacter 0% 3% 30000% 18%
E.Coli 92% 49% 53% 18% (parents)

In short, we do not see the overgrowth, but can confirm the undergrowth matches from the uBiome results.

There was a match up of the antibiotics used by…

View original post 392 altre parole

Annunci

Rispondi

Effettua il login con uno di questi metodi per inviare il tuo commento:

Logo WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Google photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Connessione a %s...